Bismarck, N.D. (AP) Snow has fallen in Dickinson in June, the first time in nearly 60 years the city has seen snow past May.
I'm a 31-year old conservative blogger. I write on many subjects including but not limited to: illegal immigration, health care reform, taxes, etc. It is imperative that Americans are kept well-informed on the issues, and I'll strive to keep you informed. I've have my work linked by major sites like HotAir, Newsbusters, and EyeblastTV. Contact Nate at ndgc.dx@gmail.com
News Ticker powered by Fox News
Showing posts with label N. Dakota. Show all posts
Showing posts with label N. Dakota. Show all posts
Saturday, June 6, 2009
N. Dakota: June Snow Fall Further Complicates Global Warming Theory
Global warming is seeming more and more ridiculous with every passing day:
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
N. Dakota: Police Twarted by Food Stamp Law
Police had to waste months of man hours tracking a thief down that should have only taken a few days, thanks to the hypersensitivity of those who collect government assistance:
What is the point of keeping the name of a criminal away from the police?
Again liberal thinking ends up wasting money that had no business being wasted.
John Schweitzer swiped his credit card, bagged his groceries and walked out of a Wal-Mart without his wallet. When he returned a moment later, it was gone.
Schweitzer's misfortune should have been an open-and-shut legal case. The thief was caught on video surveillance, and he used his own food stamp swipe card to pay for groceries before leaving with Schweitzer's wallet.
But a federal law prohibiting the disclosure of information about food stamp recipients - even to law enforcement, unless a specific name is provided - meant it would take months and a lot of legwork before an arrest was made.
What is the point of keeping the name of a criminal away from the police?
Again liberal thinking ends up wasting money that had no business being wasted.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
N. Dakota: Bill Giving Unborn Basic Human Rights Goes Down in Senate
'Personhood' bill defeated in North Dakota Senate
By DALE WETZEL Associated Press Writer
Apr 4, 3:50 AM EDT
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) -- North Dakota's Senate has rejected legislation to bestow human rights on fertilized human eggs, whether they be in the womb or in a laboratory.
Senators voted 29-16 Friday to reject legislation that sought to define as a human being "any organism with the genome of homo sapiens." The "personhood" status would include a developing embryo from the moment of conception, whether inside or outside the womb.
A handful of states are considering similar proposals, and the measure generated an intense lobbying campaign from abortion opponents and people who favor abortion rights.
Sen. Curtis Olafson, a Republican, spoke out frequently against the bill, saying it would make it difficult for doctors to treat problem pregnancies that could threaten the woman's life because both she and her unborn child would have equal status under the law.
At a Senate hearing on the legislation, two reproductive endocrinologists testified that the bill would complicate the practice of in vitro fertilization, which involves removing eggs from a woman's body, fertilizing them in a laboratory, and implanting a fertilized egg inside the womb.
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Dan Ruby, a Republican, sent an e-mail message to Democratic senators before Friday's vote, offering to write letters to the editor to vouch for their anti-abortion credentials if they backed the legislation.
"I will demonstrate my belief that this issue is more important than partisan politics," Ruby wrote.
© 2009 The Associated Press.
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/ABORTION_RESTRICTIONS?SITE=PASUN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
---------------------------------------------------------------
My Thoughts
N. Dakota has had pro-life bills like this voted on many times over the last few years by both the legislature and the people. They've been defeated everytime. Many believe that it is because they don't want to be the first to challenge Roe V. Wade. If another state took the lead, N. Dakota would be more likely to follow suit.
The result isn't unexpected, but there is some hope for the future that the travesty of abortion holocaust will end, and the unborn will receive basic human and civil rights that we all enjoy.
By DALE WETZEL Associated Press Writer
Apr 4, 3:50 AM EDT
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) -- North Dakota's Senate has rejected legislation to bestow human rights on fertilized human eggs, whether they be in the womb or in a laboratory.
Senators voted 29-16 Friday to reject legislation that sought to define as a human being "any organism with the genome of homo sapiens." The "personhood" status would include a developing embryo from the moment of conception, whether inside or outside the womb.
A handful of states are considering similar proposals, and the measure generated an intense lobbying campaign from abortion opponents and people who favor abortion rights.
Sen. Curtis Olafson, a Republican, spoke out frequently against the bill, saying it would make it difficult for doctors to treat problem pregnancies that could threaten the woman's life because both she and her unborn child would have equal status under the law.
At a Senate hearing on the legislation, two reproductive endocrinologists testified that the bill would complicate the practice of in vitro fertilization, which involves removing eggs from a woman's body, fertilizing them in a laboratory, and implanting a fertilized egg inside the womb.
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Dan Ruby, a Republican, sent an e-mail message to Democratic senators before Friday's vote, offering to write letters to the editor to vouch for their anti-abortion credentials if they backed the legislation.
"I will demonstrate my belief that this issue is more important than partisan politics," Ruby wrote.
© 2009 The Associated Press.
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/ABORTION_RESTRICTIONS?SITE=PASUN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
---------------------------------------------------------------
My Thoughts
N. Dakota has had pro-life bills like this voted on many times over the last few years by both the legislature and the people. They've been defeated everytime. Many believe that it is because they don't want to be the first to challenge Roe V. Wade. If another state took the lead, N. Dakota would be more likely to follow suit.
The result isn't unexpected, but there is some hope for the future that the travesty of abortion holocaust will end, and the unborn will receive basic human and civil rights that we all enjoy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)