Vladamir Putin: America Needs to Pass START Treaty OR ELSE

Russian Prime Minister Vladamir Putin has resorted to threats to help ram START through the lame-duck Congress:

Russia will have to build up its nuclear forces if the United States fails to ratify the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty the two countries signed this year, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin warns in an upcoming CNN interview.

"That's not our choice. We don't want that to happen. But this is not a threat on our part," Putin told CNN's Larry King in an interview to air Wednesday. "We've been simply saying that this is what all of us expects to happen if we don't agree on a joint effort there."

U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed the New START in April. The pact would cut each country's deployed nuclear warheads by approximately one-third, limiting each side to a maximum of 1,550 on no more than 700 launchers, and allow both nations to resume on-site inspections.

He said it would take "a very dumb nature" for the United States to ignore its own interests -- but if it does, "then we'll have to react somehow," including the deployment of new nuclear missile technology.

Obama has called ratification of the treaty an immediate priority, saying it's critical to national security and a cornerstone of U.S.-Russia relations. But it must still be approved by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate, where several leading Republicans have called for a vote to be delayed over concerns about missile defense and modernizing the U.S. nuclear arsenal.

But Putin said that without the treaty, Russia will have to arm itself against what the "new threats" posed by U.S. plans for a European-based missile defense system.

This is an all too transparent attempt at using the politics of fear to scare the American people into getting the GOP to cave.

Russia is not going to start lobbing nukes at us any time soon. Waiting until we prevent the tax hikes and pass a budget won't provoke a nuclear war, even if we have to wait until the next session of Congress in a month to begin to tackle the treaty.

It is much more of an immediate concern for our economy and our country to tackle the tax and budget issues first.

First Hope, Then Fear, Now Hope Again, Only Constant With Obama Is Change

Obama Takes on Role of Confidence-Builder in Chief
President mounted a stout defense of his blueprint to overhaul the economy Thursday, declaring the national crisis is "not as bad as we think" and his plans will speed recovery.
AP Thursday, March 12, 2009

WASHINGTON -- President Obama is embracing a mantle of confidence-builder in chief. Whether he is meeting with his own economic advisers or worried business leaders, his message is meant to be calm and reassuring -- even in the wake of more bad economic news.

Obama will have another opportunity to assert his optimism after he meets Friday with Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve chairman who now guides the president's economic recovery advisory board. Volcker was preparing to brief Obama and his economic team on how the $787 billion stimulus package is working.

Speaking to a gathering of the nation's CEOs on Thursday, Obama defended his plans for pulling the economy out of a downward spiral, saying that his long-term view gives him reason to maintain optimism despite an uptick in unemployment and falling economic indicators.

"I've never bought into these Malthusian, woe, Chicken Little, the earth is falling. I tend to be pretty optimistic," said Obama, once a long-shot candidate for the White House. "I wouldn't be here if I weren't pretty optimistic."

The president boldly declared that the national crisis is "not as bad as we think" and that he has seen public opinion seesaw without logic.

"A smidgen of good news and suddenly everything is doing great. A little bit of bad news and 'Ooohh, we're down on the dumps,"' he said. "And I am obviously an object of this constantly varying assessment."

Obama disagreed with the choices.

"I don't think things are ever as good as they say, or ever as bad as they say," he added. "Things two years ago were not as good as we thought because there were a lot of underlying weaknesses in the economy. They're not as bad as we think they are now."

In Congress, Obama's budget plans were meeting resistance.

Sen. Kent Conrad, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, called the track of future deficits "unsustainable" and singled out Obama's proposal for adding $634 billion in health care spending over the next 10 years.

"Some of us have a real pause about the notion of putting substantially more money into the health care system when we've already got a bloated system," said Conrad, D-N.D.

Richard Parsons, chairman of beleaguered Citigroup Inc., asked if Obama could offer some help in a national battle "between confidence and fear."

It was a similar question facing Obama's treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, before Conrad's committee. Geithner encountered blunt questions about the administration's plans for shoring up the nation's banks. He reiterated the administration's goal to lay out a private-public partnership to make up to $1 trillion in financing available to help banks clear their books of toxic, mortgage-related assets that have led to a national credit freeze.

Geithner hinted more money might be required beyond the existing $700 billion financial rescue fund: "We certainly can start with the resources we have."

But Obama, to business leaders, said not all was lost.

"For all the, you know, angst that's been out there, you've got banking institutions that are still functioning and, lo and behold, making profits," Obama said.

Meanwhile, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., played down talk that Democrats would consider a second economic stimulus bill.

The flurry of comments illustrated the complicated moving parts confronting Washington as the economy continues to decline, credit remains clogged and a new president advances broad and expensive initiatives. The money set aside to address those needs so far has been staggering -- $787 billion for an economic stimulus designed to save and create jobs, the $700 billion approved by Congress for the financial rescue package and hundreds of billions more through programs from the Federal Reserve Bank.

On top of that, Obama wants to overhaul health care, reduce greenhouse-gas pollution and undertake major changes in energy policy. He's projecting a federal deficit of $1.75 trillion this year, by far the largest in history, but says he can get it down to $533 billion by 2013.

"I am not choosing to address these additional challenges just because I feel like it, or because I'm a glutton for punishment," Obama told the Business Roundtable, a group of top business executives. "I am doing so because they are fundamental to our economic growth and to ensuring that we don't have more crises like this in the future."

---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/03/12/obama-declares-economic-crisis-bad-think/
---------------------------------------------------------------

My Thoughts

BO-"I've never bought into these Malthusian, woe, Chicken Little, the earth is falling. I tend to be pretty optimistic."

Since when. If he doesn't really believe like that, he must play like he does on TV.

BO-"I don't think things are ever as good as they say, or ever as bad as they say," he added. "Things two years ago were not as good as we thought because there were a lot of underlying weaknesses in the economy. They're not as bad as we think they are now."

I was saying the same thing while he was bring gloom and doom into our TV sets every day to scare us into accepting the porkulus package.

"A smidgen of good news and suddenly everything is doing great. A little bit of bad news and 'Ooohh, we're down on the dumps,"' he said. "And I am obviously an object of this constantly varying assessment."

You think. Duh!

Where was all of this optimism before the stimulus was passed and the stock market started free falling? We didn't hear any of "it's not so bad". We heard predictions of economic catastrophies instead.

It seems to me he did a masterful job of using the politics of fear to get it passed. Now, he doesn't have to keep on with that facade. Now, he has to try and fix the damage he caused with all of his fear mongering. His rhetoric scared the American people even more than they already were. This led to the stock market plummetting more than it would have without all the extra despair over the future of the economy.